INTRODUCTION: AN UNFINISHED DECOLONISATION
Western Sahara, a sparsely populated territory in North Africa has been a focal point of geopolitical contention since Spain’s withdrawal in 1975. Following the end of Spanish colonial rule, both Morocco and the indigenous Sahrawi nationalist movement, the Polisario Front claimed sovereignty over the territory. Morocco swiftly moved in to assert control over the majority of the land, sparking a bitter conflict that persists to this day. The region is now divided, with Morocco administering around 80 percent and the Polisario Front governing the remainder under the self-declared Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (SADR), headquartered in refugee camps in Algeria.
Despite the 1975 advisory opinion by the International Court of Justice (ICJ), which found no legal grounds for Morocco’s claim and reaffirmed the Sahrawi people’s right to self-determination, the international community has failed to uphold this right in practice (International Court of Justice, 1975). The United Nations continues to list Western Sahara as a non-self-governing territory and a promised referendum on independence, included in the 1991 ceasefire agreement, has yet to take place. Disagreements over voter eligibility, paired with limited international pressure have led to a protracted stalemate.
The consequences of this impasse are profound, Morocco has engaged in extensive economic development in the territory, often with the support of foreign investment, which further complicates the geopolitical landscape. Projects related to phosphate mining, fisheries and renewable energy are frequently launched without consultation or consent from the Sahrawi people. These initiatives serve not only to bolster Morocco’s economic claims over the region but also to marginalise the indigenous population further.
Furthermore, diplomatic apathy has enabled Morocco to gain legitimacy in the eyes of powerful international actors. In 2020, the United States became the first major power to recognise Moroccan sovereignty over Western Sahara, a decision made outside the bounds of international legal consensus. While the African Union maintains recognition of the SADR, internal divisions and diplomatic pragmatism have softened its stance. This sets the context for examining the legal and humanitarian implications of an unresolved colonial legacy that continues to challenge the effectiveness of international law.
THE LEGAL STATUS OF WESTERN SAHARA
Western Sahara’s legal status is central to understanding the enduring conflict and the paralysis of the international legal system in enforcing norms. Under international law, the region is classified as a non-self-governing territory. This designation invokes a clear legal obligation under the United Nations Charter and related human rights instruments to facilitate a process through which the people of Western Sahara can exercise their right to self-determination. The legal principle of self-determination is enshrined in Article 1 of both the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), both of which Morocco has ratified (United Nations, 1960).
The 1975 advisory opinion by the International Court of Justice unequivocally stated that Morocco’s historical ties to certain tribes in the region did not constitute sovereignty over Western Sahara (International Court of Justice, 1975). In legal terms, the opinion affirms the Sahrawi people’s right to determine their political status, free from coercion or foreign interference. Despite this, Morocco’s de facto control has continued unimpeded, bolstered by military occupation and political lobbying. The failure to implement a referendum, originally promised by the 1991 UN-brokered ceasefire agreement, underscores the gap between legal principle and political will. The United Nations Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara (MINURSO) was established specifically to organise this vote. However, the mission has become effectively paralysed lacking not only progress but also a human rights mandate, a rare omission for a UN peacekeeping operation (Human Rights Watch, 2023).
Meanwhile, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has handed down rulings asserting that Western Sahara is distinct from Morocco and that trade agreements between Morocco and the European Union cannot be applied to the territory without the explicit consent of its people (Curia, 2021). These judgments reinforce the legal distinction but have not led to significant policy changes. Multinational corporations continue to profit from resource extraction in Western Sahara, often in contravention of international legal norms.
What emerges is a pattern of legal declarations with limited follow-through. International law offers a robust framework for the realisation of Sahrawi rights, but enforcement mechanisms are either weak or politically obstructed. The international community’s reluctance to apply consistent pressure on Morocco reflects the geopolitical realities that often dictate the application of legal principles. This illustrates the limitations of international law when it is subordinated to state interests, highlighting a fundamental crisis of legitimacy in the rules based global order.
HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND THE COST OF OCCUPATION
The human rights situation in Western Sahara is alarming and persistent both in the occupied territory and among displaced populations, the Sahrawi people face systemic violations of their civil, political and socio-economic rights. Human rights organisations including Amnesty International (2023) and Human Rights Watch (2023) have consistently reported abuses by Moroccan authorities targeting Sahrawi activists, journalists and civilians who advocate for independence. These violations range from arbitrary arrest and detention to torture and surveillance.
Peaceful protests in the region are frequently met with violent crackdowns. Moroccan security forces are reported to employ excessive force and detain protesters under spurious charges. Once in custody, detainees often experience degrading treatment, with limited access to legal representation or fair trials. Families of political prisoners are subjected to harassment and many activists report surveillance and intimidation even after release. The United Nations Special Rapporteurs have repeatedly urged Morocco to comply with its obligations under international human rights treaties, yet implementation remains poor.
Freedom of expression is virtually non-existent for pro-independence Sahrawis as independent media is heavily censored and international journalists are often barred from entering the territory. The lack of media access severely restricts the flow of information and impedes international awareness. In this context, digital activism has become a crucial tool for Sahrawi youth, who risk reprisal for posting politically sensitive content online. Online surveillance, hacking and cyberbullying by state-affiliated actors have become commonplace.
Conditions in the Tindouf refugee camps in Algeria where over 170,000 Sahrawis have lived for nearly five decades also reflect the human toll of prolonged displacement (UNHCR, n.d.). Though the camps are managed with the support of international agencies and the Polisario Front, they suffer from chronic underfunding. Basic services like healthcare, education and clean water are in short supply. Youth unemployment and mental health challenges are widespread, fuelling feelings of abandonment and despair.
Gender-based violence, limited political participation and lack of justice mechanisms disproportionately affect Sahrawi women. Yet despite these challenges, women in both the camps and occupied territories have become prominent leaders in education, healthcare and human rights advocacy. Their voices are essential in shaping inclusive and sustainable solutions.
Finally, economic exploitation compounds the human rights crisis. Morocco’s resource extraction especially of phosphates, fisheries and sand continues without the consent of the Sahrawi people (Curia, 2021). These resources are vital for the territory’s future development, but profits are diverted to Moroccan state and foreign companies. The resulting economic marginalisation further entrenches dependency and reinforces the occupation.
INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND LEGAL SILENCE
The protracted crisis in Western Sahara underscores a significant failure of international legal institutions to deliver justice and uphold human rights. Despite near-universal recognition of the Sahrawi people’s right to self-determination, real action has remained elusive. The United Nations Security Council, due in part to geopolitical interests, has not enforced its own resolutions. Permanent members like France and the United States have prioritised strategic alliances with Morocco, undermining efforts to hold Rabat accountable for violations (United Nations, 1960).
MINURSO, the UN mission tasked with overseeing a referendum on independence, has lacked both progress and a human rights monitoring component a striking and controversial omission in a region where abuses are well-documented (Human Rights Watch, 2023). Efforts to include such a mandate have repeatedly been blocked by Security Council members sympathetic to Morocco. This lack of oversight allows ongoing abuses to go unreported and unaddressed, perpetuating impunity.
The African Union (AU) has historically been more supportive of the Sahrawi cause. The SADR is a full member of the AU and the organisation has issued several statements reiterating the right to self-determination. However, Morocco’s re-entry into the AU in 2017 after a 33-year absence has diluted collective action. While some member states continue to support the Sahrawi cause others, influenced by economic and diplomatic ties to Morocco have adopted more neutral or even supportive stances. This divergence limits the AU’s ability to present a unified front or implement meaningful action.
The silence of the international legal community, especially compared to responses in Ukraine, Myanmar or Palestine, reflects a concerning double standard. In Ukraine, swift condemnation, legal mobilisation and sanctions followed the 2022 invasion. In contrast, Western Sahara a case with decades of occupation receives minimal attention. This disparity reveals underlying racial, political and strategic biases that shape the enforcement of international norms.
Multinational corporations that operate in occupied Western Sahara have largely escaped scrutiny, despite benefiting from illegal resource extraction. Trade deals involving products from the territory continue in contravention of international law and enforcement mechanisms are weak. The European Court of Justice has ruled against such practices (Curia, 2021), but implementation remains lax. The lack of corporate accountability adds another layer to the impunity.
Ultimately, the international community’s inaction is not due to a lack of legal clarity but a deficit of political will. Legal norms exist, but they are only as strong as the institutions and actors willing to uphold them. Until the Sahrawi people are given the agency promised by law, the Western Sahara case will remain a glaring example of international legal duplicity.
CONCLUSION: TOWARD A MORE EQUITABLE LEGAL FUTURE
Western Sahara does not need paternalistic rescue it needs justice, inclusion and respect for its sovereignty and human dignity. A meaningful international response must begin with acknowledging the legal dimensions of the crisis and activating the mechanisms already available. This includes the potential for ICC involvement, regional legal action through the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and renewed pressure on the UN to account for its past harms and support new forms of justice-based intervention. Hybrid courts, national investigations with international support and survivor-led accountability processes could also play a role. Crucially, any path forward must prioritise the voices and needs of the Sahrawi people, particularly those in marginalised communities most affected by violence and neglect. Ending impunity, protecting civilians and rebuilding public trust in justice institutions are essential steps toward restoring Western Sahara’s future. If international justice is to be meaningful, it must respond to violations wherever and whenever they occur, not only where or when they align with political convenience. The Sahrawi people’s suffering must not remain invisible.
Bibliography
Amnesty International. (2023). Western Sahara: Protesters face brutal repression. Amnesty.org. https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/middle-east-and-north-africa/morocco-and-western-sahara/
Curia. (2021). Case T-512/12: EU-Morocco agreements and Western Sahara. Court of Justice of the European Union. https://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?language=en&num=T-512/12
Human Rights Watch. (2023). World Report 2023: Morocco and Western Sahara | Human Rights Watch https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2023/country-chapters/morocco-and-western-sahara
International Court of Justice. (1975). Western Sahara, Advisory Opinion. ICJ. https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/61/061-19751016-ADV-01-00-EN.pdf
United Nations. (1960). General Assembly Resolution 1514 (XV): Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples. UN Digital Library. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/210849?ln=en
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). (n.d). Algeria UNHCR
